Eight analytical layers, built from CMS public data and your facility's own records — not a generic
checklist with a price tag attached.
EXPOSURE
Total estimated exposure with an internal confidence interval
A point estimate plus an internal 90% interval around that estimate, so you see both the size of the
exposure and how certain the model is — not a licensed actuarial opinion or a published statistical CI.
BENCHMARKING
Facility-wide risk score vs. your actual state peers
Built from PEPPER data — the same percentile benchmarking CMS's own contractors use — across therapy
utilization, length of stay, readmissions, NTA frequency, and PDPM assessment patterns.
GAP DETECTION
PDPM-weighted gaps, not flat dollar counts
A missing Section GG score isn't valued the same as a missing diet order. Each gap type carries a PDPM
Impact Multiplier, because one missed data point can shift a resident's entire classification for the
full payment period.
INVISIBLE LOSS
The specialist gap category most audits skip
A dedicated breakout for podiatry, dentistry, and optometry consults — referral-based orders that rarely
flow through your primary physician queue, and consistently your highest-yield gap category.
AUDIT RISK
Cross-referenced against CMS's active OIG Work Plan
Every gap category is checked by name against currently published federal audit targets, so you know
which exposures carry materially higher real-world risk right now — not generically.
DYNAMIC SCORING
A score that's actually yours, not a template
Risk weighting adjusts to your own payer mix and OIG target matches. Two facilities with identical
dollar gaps can land at different risk scores depending on their census and audit-target profile.
STRUCTURAL GAP
Case-mix revenue gap, isolated from one-off errors
If your CMI runs below the state average, every Part A day is paid below what your resident acuity
justifies — a recurring quarterly loss, calculated separately from individual documentation gaps.
ADD-ON
Optional actuarial-informed internal estimate
A credibility-weighted expected-loss estimate informed by actuarial methods — loss
history, exposure base, frequency/severity trend, blended against peer/class averages.
This is an internal analytical estimate, not a licensed actuarial opinion.
What the summary dashboard looks like
Synthetic illustration — not a real facility result
Total revenue at risk (point est.) · synthetic
$56,784 / qtr
Facility risk score · synthetic
62 / 100
Active OIG target matches · synthetic
2 categories
Synthetic illustration for a hypothetical 100-bed, 3-Star facility. Your dashboard, if purchased, reflects your facility’s own data. These figures are not a performance guarantee.